Redesigning
The Scientific Approach for English Language Teaching and Learning
Denny Nugraha
TBI – B – 7
Genre-based Literacy Pedagogy
Introduction
Innovative learning strategy in
English language teaching has been seen as the necessity to fulfill the demand
of the changing era. In Indonesia, in search of the suitable educational
curriculum, the government has indeed made several changes in the policy of
education. The changes periodically were believed to make the national
education better than the policy made by the previous government and so on
until now. However, the recent curriculum, curriculum 2013 (henceforth K-13),
is seen as problematic by some parties. It was perceived as controversial especially
by some of English teachers, academicians and even politicians since it was
officially set as the national curriculum by the government. This can be seen
in many of education institutions from the secondary schools (SMP/MTs) and high
schools (SMA/SMK/MA) which still implement the preceded curriculum (KTSP 2006).
The problem draws at least two importances why it is high time to redesign the
scientific approach for English teaching and learning in schools.
Scientific
Approach in English Teaching
Firstly, the controversy comes of the
scientific approach from its complicated learning stages in relation with the
learning objectives. The characteristic of K-13 is that the learning activities
in the classroom should be conducted using this approach. The approach is
mandatory set by the curriculum in every school subject including English. In
this approach, the teachers are expected to empower learning activities that
are scientifically based on the factual procedures. Additionally, Hidayat
(2016) quoted Nasution’s statement (2013) that the scientific approach has
several stages, namely starting from observing, questioning, exploring or
experimenting, reasoning or associating, and communicating or creating. However,
it can be seen from these stages that the learning process is indeed regarded as
serious and difficult as the scientists who want to reveal something new. The
stages truly denied the teaching English objectives in high schools stated by Doddy
et al (2008) that the objectives are to encourage students communicating in
English according to the context of the language being used and to facilitate
students with the aspects of interpretation, convention, collaboration,
cultural knowledge, problem solving, and reflection. Accordingly, the
scientific approach should be rearranged to meet the useful pedagogical
practices without disregarding objectives of English language learning.
Lastly, the other problem raised in
the implementation of the scientific approach is its inflexibility. In his
essay, Hidayat (2016) concludes that, as he considered in some studies (Panjaitan,
2014; Sehatiin, 2015), the approach
makes the language teaching become inflexible. It can be seen that many
teachers who found difficulties to conduct all of the learning stages because
the time allotment for teaching through the approach is not enough. So that, the
approach must be reset to be synchronous between
the policy and the reality in its implementation. It is supported by the late
Alwasilah (2014) that English teaching should be redesigned to promote new
forms of knowledge and culture and this would require a great deal of
flexibility in the teaching methods. In line with this, the scientific approach
should reflect the language teaching not only English to discover new forms of
knowledge and culture. So that, it will be suitable for language teaching that
is more flexible than another studies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the writer believes
that it is high time to reconsider the implementation of scientific approach
especially for English language teaching. Two important things to redesign the
approach must be taken into account. The first is that to promote new forms of
knowledge and culture, the approach should be in line with the objectives of
teaching English in schools. In addition, according to Widdowson (2004) in Larsen-Freeman
and Anderson (2011) that in language learning what is needed is not a universal
solution, but rather a ‘shift to localization,’ in which pedagogic practices
are designed in relation to local contexts, needs, and objectives
(Larsen-Freeman 2000; Bax 2003; Canagarajah 2005). Then, the second is that
English teaching should deal with its flexibility in teaching methods. In other
words, it should not be taught by only one method/approach, but it should be
flexible to adopt various methods/approaches in order to make the learning
process joyful and not boring or even complicated for students. This has also
to do with the teaching time management in the classroom by the teachers, so
that the whole learning stages can be done properly.
References
Alwasilah, Chaedar. 2014. Islam, Culture, and Education:
Essays on Contemporary Indonesia. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bax, S. 2003. The end of CLT:
A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal 57/3: 278–87.
Canagarajah, A. (ed.). 2005. Reclaiming
the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doddy, Achmad et al. 2008. Developing English Competencies for Senior High School (SMA/MA). Jakarta: Books Center of National Education Department.
Hidayat, Hendi. 2016. Revisiting the Scientific Approach in
Language Teaching.
IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon: An Unpublished Essay.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane.
2000. On the appropriateness of language
teaching methods in language and development in J. Shaw, D. Lubelske, and
M. Noullet (eds.). Partnership and
Interaction: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language and
Development. Hanoi, Vietnam, 65–71. Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology.
Larsen-Freeman,
Diane & Anderson, Marti. 2011. Techniques
and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Nasution, K. 2013. Aplikasi Model
Pembelajaran dalam Perspektif Pendekatan Saintifik, Diktat Kemenag.
Panjaitan, S. 2015. The Implementation of
Scientific Approach in Teaching Reading Comprehension at Smk Negeri 3 Jambi in
the Academic Year 2014/2015. Jambi.
Sehatiin, B. 2014. The Implementation of
Scientific Approach in the Teaching of Reading Narrative Text to the Tenth
Grade Students. UNESA.
Widdowson, H. G. 2004. A perspective on recent trends in A. P.
R. Howatt with H. G. Widdowson. A History
of English Language Teaching (2nd edn.), 353–72. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar