Revitalizing Indonesian Language Teaching to Develop Literacy
Competitiveness
By: Denny Nugraha
TBI-B-4
IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
The practice of Indonesian language teaching at this time is far
from satisfactory. The low of academic writing skills of university graduates
is the failure of Indonesian language teaching from elementary up to university
level. Fixing the current system of our language teaching is really a huge task
and it is often difficult to be solved. However, this problem must be settled
in considering the reality that our literacy rate is less competitive among
Asian counterparts. In addition, building literacy competitiveness can not be
easy and instantaneous. Competitiveness in literacy can only be established
through the long recurrent process of language practice which influenced by
certain factors. In Indonesian context, literacy competitiveness must refer to the
revitalization of three important factors in Indonesian language teaching:
teachers, curriculum, and language policy.
First, teachers have important roles in Indonesian language
teaching. Unfortunately, most of teachers tend to emulate their former teachers
in the classroom. The tendency to emphasize theory rather than practice of
language has been a common phenomenon in language teaching class. To solve such
problem, teachers have to acquire the acquisition about literacy and
professional pedagogy of Indonesian language teaching. In other words, building
competitiveness of our literacy means to establish professional Indonesian language
teachers that emphasize the necessity of balancing both theory and practice.
Second, the national curriculum of language education is crucial to
our language teaching success. The newest curriculum is formulated in three
different competencies. Those are namely attitude, knowledge, and skill
competency. Unfortunately, the system of curriculum recently tends to
concentrate students on the knowledge competency only. For instance, the final
curriculum evaluation consists of a multiple choice type of test. As the
result, students are lack of creativity and critical thinking. Thus, curriculum
of our language education should be redesigned in order to encompass the three
competencies. Finally, it is able to support the competitiveness of our literacy.
Third, language policy is the most important aspect in our language
teaching. Moreover, language policy is a mechanism by which the government
seeks to influence language behavior. So that, Indonesian language should be
promoted as the national development and language education should create a
mechanism of empowerment. But, the current language policy has failed to
empower students’ literacy through Indonesian language. At university level,
the reason why intellectuals are lack of writing skills is wrong belief that
Indonesian language does not potential in science and technology in comparing
with other foreign language. Therefore, it is high time to revitalize language
policy by promoting Indonesian language as equally competitive with other
foreign language in science and technology.
In conclusion, revitalizing our language education is preferable
Indonesian language teaching that makes students to be creative and
imaginative. It is not only dealing with the knowledge or theories of language.
Then, students’ creativity in literacy needs high quality language education
which encompasses creative and critical Indonesian language teachers, an intact
curriculum of language education, and the language policies that promote
Indonesian language in science and technology. Thus, revitalization in our
language teaching is needed to create a better competitiveness of literacy.
References:
Alwasilah,
Chaedar. 2012. Pokoknya Rekayasa Literasi. Bandung: PT Kiblat Buku Utama
2014. Islam, Culture, and
Education. Bandung: PT Remaja RosdakaryaDownload Full Text Here
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar